Skip to content

Search

Showing 141 results for "playground case faq"
  • Women face severe, even life-threatening, harm because the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) disregarded their health and safety. By removing safety standards it once provided to women using abortion drugs, the FDA recklessly endangered them. And because of the FDA’s lawless actions, women and girls across the country have suffered. This spring, we’re asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hold the FDA accountable. We’re representing pro-women doctors who have witnessed firsthand the harm to women and girls caused by what the FDA has done. Will you stand with Alliance Defending Freedom and these ...
  • … Our case against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will … care about that—and every American should care about this case. As oral argument approaches, will you join us in … as for the Supreme Court justices who will consider the case? … Historic Case Before U.S. Supreme Court … Supreme …
  • … other states ready to stand up and protect children. … New Case Defends Law Taking on Dangerous Medical “Care” for …
  • … now and help support Branches Pregnancy Resource Center’s case? Your support will help fuel this important case, which could allow ministries like Branches to serve …
  • When the government discriminates against foster/adoptive parents based on their religious beliefs, children are harmed. These kids need a forever home—not political ideology. Christians and the church have been key to providing resources and open arms to vulnerable children for hundreds of years. The earliest orphanages in North America were created by dedicated Christian groups, and these faithful people continue to lead the way today. Yet, some state officials now reject Christian and other religious families—forcing children to wait longer for a loving home—because they disagree with the ...
  • What is happening? At a time when the need to provide children with a stable and loving home is at a point of “crisis,” many states are forcing adoptive parents to pass an ideological litmus test to qualify. In some states, if the parents aren’t willing to push the government’s message on sexuality and gender, they can’t adopt. Simply put: government officials and policies are actively discriminating against Americans of faith—prioritizing ideology over the needs of kids. That’s cruel, it harms children, and it’s unconstitutional. Who is harmed? Nearly 400,000 children are currently in the ...
  • … why Alliance Defending Freedom took on the FDA. But this case is likely far from over. We must be ready to stand firm on behalf of women and girls as the case continues. We never charge our clients a dime to …
  • … waiting for their forever homes. We’re taking on Jessica’s case to ensure that Oregon cannot arbitrarily exclude Jessica … ruled against Jessica in 2023. That’s why we’ve taken her case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. We’re … the state’s ideological agenda. As a non-profit, this case is only possible because of support from people like …
  • … The Colorado Supreme Court has agreed to hear the latest case against cake artist and Masterpiece Cakeshop owner Jack … decision to the state’s high court, which will hear the case. But we can’t defend Jack—or any of our clients—without …
  • … freedom and which ones don’t. It’s no wonder that Lorie’s case has landed at the U.S. Supreme Court, which will hear arguments in this landmark case this December. Free speech is essential to a free … Will you join us in covering Lorie and this pivotal case in prayer? Free speech is for everyone, and no one …