Skip to content

Search

Showing 7 results for "detailspages case details little rock family planning services v rutledge"
  • … Freedom was on the legal team that overturned Roe v. Wade at the Supreme Court. With state and federal … life. Clients don’t have to pay a penny for ADF’s legal services. When you and others give, ADF can focus on serving … lives, instead of the financial burdens of litigating a case. God has shown us time and time again that when we stand …
  • … protecting religious freedom, free speech, marriage and family, parental rights, and the sanctity of life. We are …
  • … protecting religious freedom, free speech, marriage and family, parental rights, and the sanctity of life. We are …
  • … and cross-sex hormone treatments. Source: Focus on the Family 12 states Do not allow parents to be involved in their …
  • … on their behalf. As a nonprofit, we provide our legal services without charging a dime — all the way to the Supreme …
  • “Our basic Constitutional rights and religious freedom are under attack as never before. Thank God Alliance Defending Freedom is there to offer powerful legal protection and tangible hope.” - Neil Boron, Host, National Crawford Roundtable We must stand together to defend our freedom. By partnering with Alliance Defending Freedom right now – with your gift of $19 a month – you are advancing our God-given right to live and speak the Truth. Your first month’s gift will DOUBLE through a limited-time Matching Grant, while funds last. With nearly an 80% win rate for the cases we take on, you can ...
  • ADF defends all our clients FREE of charge and is able to do so through the generous gifts of people like you. Help ADF stand for people like you and make your tax-deductible gift today. Meet some of our clients “Alliance Defending Freedom is a firewall against tyranny. America is stronger, freer and more faithful because they fight to win." -Charlie Kirk ADF Client - Loudoun County School Teachers A district policy forces teachers to violate their beliefs by requiring them to address “gender-expansive or transgender students” in a manner inconsistent with their biological sex. In other words ...