Filter by
Search
Showing 1289 results for "detailspages blog details allianceedge 2017 04 05 weekly digest 4 5 17"
- The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Matt Bowman regarding the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision Monday to hear Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, a case that involves holding federal agency officials accountable to protect religious freedom and the sanctity of life for all Americans: “Unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats are weaponizing federal laws to violate Americans’ most fundamental rights. As we explain in the brief we filed urging the Supreme Court to take this case, federal agency officials frequently disrespect Americans’ most cherished ...
- The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Legal Counsel Kellie Fiedorek regarding the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ issuance Thursday of the final version of the Conscience Rights in Health Care rule: “One of the freedoms Americans have cherished most is the freedom to live according to their faith and conscience, free from government coercion. Unfortunately, ADF clients and other nurses, doctors, and health care providers have faced discrimination and even have lost their jobs because of their commitment to saving life. We commend the Trump ...
- State law forces web, graphic designer to promote same-sex ceremonies, forbids her from communicating publicly about her views
- … that California’s marriage amendment--Article I, Section 7.5 of the state constitution--is unconstitutional in part … that California’s marriage amendment--Article I, Section 7.5 of the state constitution--is unconstitutional in part …
- ADF attorneys represent couple, their video production company, who don’t want govt to force them to tell stories that violate their beliefs
- Va. school district denies honor society credit for student’s community service because event was religious
- ADF attorneys represent Michigan graduate student expelled for her beliefs
- ADF withdraws suit after school district agrees to allow religious discussion, expression during lunch
- High court protects the rights of citizens interacting with public officials on social media and the rights of officials engaged in private speech