Filter by
Search
Showing 356 results for "detailspages author details nathaniel bruno"
- The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Legal Counsel Jacob Reed following a federal district court hearing held Monday in Christian Employers Alliance v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, a case in which ADF attorneys represent CEA in a challenge to two Biden administration mandates that force religious nonprofit and for-profit employers to pay for and perform surgeries, procedures, counseling, and treatments that seek to alter one’s biological sex—actions that violate their religious beliefs: “The Constitution protects religious healthcare providers and ...
- Idaho attorney general asks US Supreme Court to stop feds from forcing ER doctors to perform abortions
- 3rd Circuit ruling allows pro-life speech to resume on public sidewalks
- Gov. Paterson’s mandate orders state agencies to honor out-of-state same-sex ‘marriages’ in violation of state law
- ADF attorneys serving as co-counsel to Attorney General Morrisey file motion to dismiss baseless lawsuit, protect unborn lives
- ADF files friend-of-the-court-brief asking for reversal of panel’s 2-1 decision against student privacy
- Georgian woman lost child after mistreatment by Russian authorities
- Though flawed, 3rd Circuit decision left standing makes clear city ordinance doesn’t apply to pro-life sidewalk counselors
- ADF appeals ruling that upheld sweeping prohibition on free speech throughout city
- The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defense Fund Legal Counsel Dale Schowengerdt regarding the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit to declare the federal Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional in Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and Gill v. Office of Personnel Management: “Society should protect and strengthen marriage, not undermine it. The federal Defense of Marriage Act provides that type of protection, and we trust the U.S. Supreme Court will reverse the 1st Circuit’s erroneous decision.” “In allowing one ...