Filter by
Search
Showing 2064 results for "detailspages blog details allianceedge 2019 02 08 do born alive babies deserve protection some senators say no"
- The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel and Vice President for Appellate Advocacy John Bursch regarding a friend-of-the-court brief ADF attorneys filed Friday asking the U.S. Supreme Court to grant review in Villarreal v. Alaniz, a case in which a citizen journalist is challenging government officials who claim they can evade responsibility after violating her First Amendment rights: “All government officials have a duty to uphold the Constitution, and they are not immune from being held responsible if they illegally punish a citizen simply because ...
- … said ADF Senior Counsel Ryan Bangert. “The government has no authority to unilaterally treat unvaccinated employees … employers to compel that result. The lawsuit takes no position on any COVID-19 vaccine or whether any person … to become coercive extensions of state power. We have no choice but to push back against this intrusion of the …
- … citizens,” said ADF Senior Legal Counsel Kevin Theriot. “No government employer is permitted by the Constitution to … him, Dombrowski was informed during a meeting that he has “no free speech rights in the government workplace.” “The … citizens,” said ADF Senior Legal Counsel Kevin Theriot. “No government employer is permitted by the Constitution to …
- ADF attorneys represent Turning Point USA chapter organizers
- Arizona State University officials demand that pro-life club members purchase insurance before exercising free speech rights on campus
- After receiving letter, agency rules that tech giant can’t suppress vote
- ADF attorneys represent Young Americans for Liberty chapter
- WASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of Justice publicized its support Monday for two religious freedom cases that are being litigated by attorneys with the Alliance Defense Fund. The two cases were among four featured in the DOJ’s publication Religious Freedom in Focus. “Christians and Christian organizations should not be singled out for different treatment merely because they are religious. We appreciate the DOJ’s position on these two cases and are glad they concur with the analysis that discrimination against someone based upon their point of view is unacceptable under the Constitution,” said ...
- Commonwealth’s high court affirms lower court ruling
- Christian student group was excluded from student activity fee funding extended to other groups