Search

Learn more about the landmark Supreme Court case Trinity Lutheran v. Comer, and how a church in Missouri won a major victory for religious liberty.

Professor pressured to refer to a male student as a woman.

Justus Abramo was a first grade student in the Nazareth Area School District, and Valentine’s Day was right around the corner.

Another Photographer Is Taking a Stand for Freedom — This Time in Kentucky

Barronelle Stutzman’s story of continuing struggle for religious freedom should be alarming to every American who cherishes freedom, not just to Christians.

The EEOC punished Harris Funeral Homes for trying to follow the law as written and elevated politics above the interests of grieving families.

Track athletes Selina Soule, Chelsea Mitchell, and Alanna Smith are taking a stand against harmful policies that allow male athletes to compete against women.

Web designer Lorie Smith is taking her case 303 Creative v. Elenis to the U.S. Supreme Court. Support her stand for free speech here.

President Biden's private employer COVID-19 mandate ignores the Constitution. Alliance Defending Freedom is challenging this government overreach. Support ADF Now Americans may have different opinions about COVID-19 vaccines, but every American should agree that the government’s national private employer vaccine mandate is a vast and unlawful power grab by the executive branch. The Biden administration has followed through on its promised vaccine mandate for private employers and it violates federal law and the U.S. Constitution. Alliance Defending Freedom is suing the administration ...

ADF defends all our clients FREE of charge and is able to do so through the generous gifts of people like you. Help ADF stand for people like you and make your tax-deductible gift today. Meet some of our clients “Alliance Defending Freedom is a firewall against tyranny. America is stronger, freer and more faithful because they fight to win." -Charlie Kirk ADF Client - Loudoun County School Teachers A district policy forces teachers to violate their beliefs by requiring them to address “gender-expansive or transgender students” in a manner inconsistent with their biological sex. In other words ...