Skip to content

Search

Showing 265 results for "detailspages blog details allianceedge 2018 08 02 disturbing reason why faith based adoption providers are shutting their doors"
  • … Reed v. Town of Gilbert (2015), NIFLA v. Becerra (2018), and 303 Creative v. Elenis (2023). What speech does … finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable.” For this reason, Supreme Court rulings have protected even the vile … ACLU president Nadine Strossen writes in her book HATE: Why We Should Resist It with Free Speech, Not Censorship , …
  • … Court, its legal fight continues. Let’s take a look at the details of this case. What is the March for Life Education … is a pro-life nonprofit organization, and its beliefs are based on morality and science. Of course, it strives to … with its pro-life beliefs in everything it does. That’s why March for Life does not want to promote abortion through …
  • … State Legislatures Are at the Front Lines of Securing Generational Wins … In fact, 46 states have elections in at least one of their legislative chambers this November—that’s 85 percent of … your legislator how you’d like them to vote on a bill and why. Legislators often use the number of phones calls they …
  • … opinion, or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein.” Wooley v. Maynard (1977) A Jehovah’s Witness … Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra (2018) ADF represented the National Institute of Family and … a letter to the Missouri legislature advocating same-sex adoption. Emily asked for an alternate assignment. At first, …
  • … medical information. Section 1 forbids healthcare providers from providing medical information related to … U.S.C. § 1738A generally requires each state to give full faith and credit to child custody determinations made by … is an “inconvenient forum” compared to another state based on factors like how long the child has lived outside …
  • … online, allowing people to listen even when they are not in the car or near a traditional radio. As with any … apply multiple statutes, and affirmed the rate structure. Why did ADF ask the Supreme Court to hear the case? The … change unlawful. Instead, it affirmed the new rule based on faulty logic. The CRB incorrectly applied the …
  • … said. “It was just a time I had to take a stand.” Read the details of Barronelle’s case below. Barronelle Stutzman ended … was targeted even though she served everyone. That’s why she continued to appeal her case. Outcome People of … States Supreme Court  to hear Barronelle’s case. June 2018 : The U.S. Supreme Court vacated the Washington Supreme …
  • … women, and others have tried to bury them in paperwork based on unfounded investigations. And President Biden … staff and volunteers who are not licensed health-care providers from offering even non-medical information, … serve women in accordance with their pro-life beliefs. In 2018, ADF won a victory for pregnancy centers at the Supreme …
  • … be subject to such employer-mandated vaccination programs based upon the objecting employee’s sincerely held religious … personal religious beliefs that are at issue, which is why employers are legally not permitted to inquire whether … or 2) a specific, sincerely held belief rooted in your faith that taking these particular COVID-19 vaccines would …
  • … the western part of the state, Christian Healthcare is a faith-based organization that focuses on serving the … to the dictates of the Christian faith. That’s exactly why Christian Healthcare provides subsidized medical care to … stipulation that should not be controversial. But in 2018, the Michigan Civil Rights Commission reinterpreted …