Search

… v. Wiesman SEATTLE — The legal teams who won their cases on behalf of Conestoga Wood Specialties and Hobby Lobby … View Profile … SEATTLE — The legal teams who won their cases on behalf of Conestoga Wood Specialties and Hobby Lobby …

Texas district court criticizes administration’s unlawful attempt to use federal health agency to advance radical abortion agenda

… US Supreme Court sends nonprofit abortion-pill mandate cases back to lower courts Published May 16, 2016 Related Cases: Geneva College v. Azar Southern Nazarene University v. … decision to send the consolidated abortion-pill mandate cases, including the ADF cases  Southern Nazarene University …

… parental rights, and the sanctity of life. # # # Related Cases Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Scardina Masterpiece Cakeshop …

… applicable anti-discrimination law. See  Telescope Media Grp. v. Lucero , … (8th Cir. 2019);  Brush & Nib … Stutzman only because of news reports based on social media posts. Alliance Defending Freedom is an … applicable anti-discrimination law. See  Telescope Media Grp. v. Lucero , … (8th Cir. 2019);  Brush & Nib …

ADF files appeal on behalf of Lexington printer in lawsuit with potential ramifications for all business owners

The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Matt Bowman regarding the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision Monday to hear Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, a case that involves holding federal agency officials accountable to protect religious freedom and the sanctity of life for all Americans: “Unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats are weaponizing federal laws to violate Americans’ most fundamental rights. As we explain in the brief we filed urging the Supreme Court to take this case, federal agency officials frequently disrespect Americans’ most cherished ...

… to approve a “Choose Life” plate in that state. In both cases, the “Choose Life” plates were singled out for denial … to approve a “Choose Life” plate in that state. In both cases, the “Choose Life” plates were singled out for denial …

The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Erin Hawley, vice president of the Center for Life and Regulatory Practice, regarding the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision Wednesday to hear the case U.S. Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit restored common-sense safeguards for chemical abortion drugs: “Every court so far has agreed that the FDA acted unlawfully in removing common-sense safeguards for women and authorizing dangerous mail-order abortions. We urge the Supreme Court ...

… supply of birth control pills mailed to clients was $2.98, but the Medicaid reimbursement Planned Parenthood received for the pills was $26.32. In some cases, the Postal Service returned the pills to Planned … Parenthood received for the pills was $26.32. In some cases, the Postal Service returned the pills to Planned …