Search

… the 9th Circuit reversed the decision, allowing the ACLU’s case to move forward. ADF attorneys appealed the 9th Circuit … to the U.S. Supreme Court, which agreed to hear the case in May 2010. Just under a year later, the Court ruled in … have only dreamed about the opportunity, previously.   Case timeline February 2000 : The ACLU filed a lawsuit on …

Counselors are increasingly coming under threat from local, state, and federal laws and policies that seek to insert the government’s preferred views on gender into private conversations between a counselor and clients who are minors. Counselors are facing the prospect of making a choice no American should ever have to make: speak the truth to clients knowing they might face devastating consequences, or abandon their faith in order to speak only government-approved values and perspectives. The government has no business censoring conversations between clients and counselors, and Alliance ...

… employees without compromising their religious beliefs. Case timeline May 2012 : ADF attorneys filed a lawsuit on …

… to compel Americans to speak messages they disagree with. Case timeline June 2013 : Coeur d’Alene passed an ordinance … licenses as of Oct. 15, based on its Oct. 7 ruling. Oct. 17, 2014 : The Knapps politely declined a request to perform …

… when they use illegal edicts to do so.   Why does this case matter? ADF attorneys filed a lawsuit on College of the … the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the college’s case, leaving the issue unresolved. We are hopeful it will …

… information about students to their parents. Such is the case with Harrisonburg City Public Schools (HCPS) in … children. Religious freedom The teachers involved in this case have sincerely held religious beliefs that govern and … to lie or deny their core beliefs just to keep a job. Case timeline August 2021 : Harrisonburg City Public Schools …

When the government discriminates against foster/adoptive parents based on their religious beliefs, children are harmed. These kids need a forever home—not political ideology. Christians and the church have been key to providing resources and open arms to vulnerable children for hundreds of years. The earliest orphanages in North America were created by dedicated Christian groups, and these faithful people continue to lead the way today. Yet, some state officials now reject Christian and other religious families—forcing children to wait longer for a loving home—because they disagree with the ...

… that question, but I do know that refusing to argue your case does not make your argument look stronger. The professor … … abortion … pro-life … sanctity of life … public square … Case:Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization … I Came …

What is happening? At a time when the need to provide children with a stable and loving home is at a point of “crisis,” many states are forcing adoptive parents to pass an ideological litmus test to qualify. In some states, if the parents aren’t willing to push the government’s message on sexuality and gender, they can’t adopt. Simply put: government officials and policies are actively discriminating against Americans of faith—prioritizing ideology over the needs of kids. That’s cruel, it harms children, and it’s unconstitutional. Who is harmed? Nearly 400,000 children are currently in the ...

… helped file a lawsuit on behalf of the company, and the case eventually went to the U.S. Supreme Court. Who are the … to their beliefs without being punished by the government. Case timeline January 2013 : With the help of ADF and allied … allied attorneys asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case. June 2014 : The Supreme Court reversed the 3rd …