Search

… in government from Hillsdale College’s Van Andel Graduate School of Government in Washington, D.C., and a B.A. in …

… violated his conscience. Or the Massachusetts family whose school began treating their daughter as a boy, in opposition …

… in the spring. Dr. Hiers sent an email to the chair asking why he had been fired, and the chair gave several reasons, … filed a lawsuit on behalf of Dr. Hiers. A federal district court ruled that the university likely violated Dr. Hiers’ … the lawsuit to proceed. Outcome Following the district court’s ruling, the University of North Texas agreed to a …

… Defending Freedom is an alliance-building, non-profit legal organization committed to protecting religious freedom, … Defending Freedom is an alliance-building, non-profit legal organization committed to protecting religious freedom, …

… Washington Post , readers were introduced to Brooke, an 18-year-old mother of twins. The new mother lives in Texas, … most important person in your own life? Yet even this 18-year-old mother seems to realize what she has now is far more … too compelling not to be told: the most vulnerable among us deserve protection, and pregnancy resource centers around …

… in their children’s lives. For example, more and more school districts are ignoring parents’ instructions and even …

… and lacking proper reporting on bad outcomes for the women taking them. In courtrooms and legislatures across the …

… and goes a long way toward furthering our efforts in court on behalf of women and girls all over the country. And … its rewriting of this federal law.” Donate today to help us stand for female athletes everywhere. … Help Defend Truth …

… of the cost. Outcome Thankfully, a federal district court agreed with Dr. Tice-Harouff’s claims. After issuing a strong opinion temporarily blocking the rule change, the court issued a final order in December 2022 restoring the … planning for 58 million women. In addition, the district court later issued an order requiring the Biden …

The Biden administration is wreaking havoc on Title IX. Title IX was passed in 1972 to protect equal opportunities for women, not harm them. Now, the administration has issued a radical change that redefines “sex” in federal law to include “gender identity.” This means that “sex,” under federal law, would be based on how someone identifies, not biological reality. These changes gut equal opportunities for women, erode student privacy, and threaten women’s sports and safety. The Biden administration claims that this radical change won’t affect women’s opportunities. But the government can’t ...