Skip to content

Search

Showing 1895 results for "u mich settles lawsuit revises discriminatory student group funding policy"
  • …  – A floral artist from Washington state asked the U.S. Supreme Court Friday to reverse a  decision by the … Anyone who supports the First Amendment rights that the U.S. Constitution guarantees to all of us should stand with … right of free expression.” As the petition filed with the U.S. Supreme Court in  Arlene’s Flowers v. State of …
  • … Video  |  SOTs  |  B-roll  |  Photos   WASHINGTON  – The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday that courts and federal … … Video  |  SOTs  |  B-roll  |  Photos   WASHINGTON  – The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday that courts and federal …
  • … attorneys represent Capitoland Christian Center Church in lawsuit Published February 24, 2022 Related Case: Sandoval v. … are litigating a case that is currently before the U.S. Supreme Court,  Seattle’s Union Gospel Mission v. Woods … are litigating a case that is currently before the U.S. Supreme Court,  Seattle’s Union Gospel Mission v. Woods …
  • … attorneys serve as co-counsel with MT attorney general in lawsuit filed by Planned Parenthood Published January 20, …
  • … Ironically, YouTube’s error is the crux of  ADF’s lawsuit  against the FDA. YouTube’s disclaimer says that the … Ironically, YouTube’s error is the crux of  ADF’s lawsuit  against the FDA. YouTube’s disclaimer says that the …
  • The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Legal Counsel Erik Stanley regarding the Texas Supreme Court’s decision Friday that requires the city of Houston to either repeal or put to a vote a city ordinance that qualified for the ballot but that city officials illegally kept off. Those officials, including Mayor Anise Parker, also unsuccessfully attempted to subpoena the sermons and communications of pastors, known as the “Houston 5,” whom ADF represented in Woodfill v. Parker: “Public officials should not be allowed to run roughshod over the right of the people ...
  • U.S. Supreme Court protects free speech online High court … Case: O'Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier WASHINGTON  – The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Friday that public officials can be … on behalf of the Manhattan Institute, a nonprofit public-policy research foundation with the mission to develop and …
  • … Gianforte’s signs a bill ensuring that taxpayer dollars funding Title X family planning programs are kept separate … by Rep. Amy Regier ensuring that taxpayer dollars funding Title X family planning programs are kept separate … family planning services. It does so by prioritizing funding to primary and preventive healthcare providers and …
  • … women falls flat ADF attorneys represent state in lawsuit filed by abortion giant Published September 8, 2021 … in that state. In an ADF case,  NIFLA v. Becerra , the U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed in 2018 that states can freely … in that state. In an ADF case,  NIFLA v. Becerra , the U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed in 2018 that states can freely …
  • The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Legal Counsel Stephanie Nichols regarding Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’ signing Thursday of SB 1580, a bill that protects doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals and organizations from being forced to participate in health care services that violate their conscience: “Americans shouldn’t be forced to violate their ethical and religious beliefs, and this certainly includes doctors, nurses, and other medical providers. Thankfully, SB 1580 is a strong step in outlining comprehensive protections in Florida law for medical ...