Search

… compete in female athletics in the state. Case Documents Court Title Date Appellate Court Brief of Alliance Defending Freedom as amicus curiae in …

… represented four parents in the case. Case Documents Court Title Date Trial Court Order 5/29/2008 Trial Court Memorandum in support of motion to intervene 12/19/2006 …

… Active State Supreme Court Doe v. Madison Metropolitan School District Details … facts from parents. Case Documents Court Title Date State Supreme Court Combined memorandum in support of bypass and an …

… policy prepared by ADF attorneys. A full panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit previously dismissed a … "offended observer" claim lacked standing. Case Documents Court Title Date Trial Court Order of Dismissal 5/21/2010 Trial Court Order and …

… sex—without any public discussion or vote.  Case Documents Court Title Date Appellate Court Brief of Tammy Fournier, a Wisconsin mother, as amica …

… ADF at the Supreme Court SCOTUS Cases Pending Decisions Cases Pending Cert Grant … and allow them to have the same opportunities that it makes available to others. Case Documents   Explainer   Press …

… Won U.S. Supreme Court Rosenberger v. Rector and Visitors of the University of … viewpoint discrimination. A neutral funding program that makes funding available to all student groups does not violate the Establishment Clause of the First …

… ADF to Supreme Court: WWI memorial cross deserves to stand ADF files … “The Supreme Court was right to take up this case so that it has the opportunity to affirm that the offended feelings … of the Constitution’s Establishment Clause, they have no clear standard by which to predict what symbols, designs, and …

… Won U.S. Supreme Court Mitchell v. Helms Details Documents Summary Chapter 2 … to be allocated to schools with qualifying needs, whether it be a public or a private school, even when some of the …

… Won U.S. Supreme Court Van Orden v. Perry Details Documents Profiles Summary … reflecting the political history of the state did not constitute an unlawful establishment of religion.  The monument’s religious content alone did not …