Search

… December 7, 2023 On June 24, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in  Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization , overturning Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey . The decision upheld … wrong but because the so-called right to an abortion has no basis in the Constitution’s text, structure, or history. …

… while the bill is superfluous and ideological, buried in its text are grave threats to religious freedom, free speech, … previous rulings, proponents of this bill are letting no crisis, real or imagined, go to waste. That’s why they are … addressed the issue of same-sex marriage. First, in United States v. Windsor (2013), it struck down the DOMA provision …

… complete agendas and minutes of every meeting of its board of directors; documents sent to donors; employee … said his office had “worked very closely, obviously, with Planned Parenthood” in litigation related to abortion in … Planned Parenthood. But when it came to Obria, he launched extensive investigations and demanded documentation that was …

… to follow Supreme Court precedent . The court even said in its opinion that the Pittsburgh law “imposes the same kind of … … First Amendment … free speech … Pennsylvania … planned parenthood … abortion … pro-choice … pro-life … Supreme Court of the United States … How Pittsburgh Tried to Silence Pro-Life Sidewalk …

… be overturned. On the morning of June 24, 2022, most had no idea that this would be the day. In May, there was an … . Some expected the U.S. Supreme Court to release its opinion in the case immediately after the leak. And when … advocates had the first glimmer of hope with the case Planned Parenthood v. Casey , which involved a Pennsylvania …

… to the people and their elected lawmakers—allowing states to enact strong pro-life policies. Now, the Biden … of EMTALA and prevented Idaho from enforcing its law, Idaho filed an emergency application for stay … appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court to allow Idaho to continue to enforce its law and protect the lives of women …

… passed their own public-accommodation laws. While many states correctly apply these laws to help ensure people have access to basic goods and services, Colorado misused its law to force people to say things they don’t believe, … to ensure people have access to basic goods and services. No one should be denied food at a restaurant, a ticket at a …

… No Strings Attached: Why the Government Shouldn’t Tax … Fathers understood that to have a free society, all its members must be able to practice their religion without … to control—or destroy—religious institutions. It is no surprise, then, that churches have been tax-exempt since the …

… Published April 10, 2024 Revised April 22, 2024 Since its government and constitution were established in 1890, the … its Defense of Life Act. The federal government has no authority to override the will of Idaho voters enacted … of life … pro-life … Idaho … Supreme Court of the United States … Why EMTALA and Idaho's Law Both Protect Life …

… in 1993 by pro-life attorney Thomas Glessner. According to its website, NIFLA “exists to protect life-affirming … for a county office, which would then refer women to Planned Parenthood or other abortion providers. 2. It forced … to continue working to protect life.   The bottom line No one should be forced by the government to express a …