Skip to content

Search

Showing 540 results for "detailspages faith justice details updates charges of hate speech"
  • … Lost U.S. Courts of Appeals Bronx Household of Faith v. Board of Education of the City of New York Details Videos Documents Resources Profiles Summary Pastors … Jordan Lorence : President Obama's Department of Justice once again rejects protection for religious liberty …
  • … Active U.S. Courts of Appeals Speech First v. McCall Details Documents Profiles Summary …
  • … Won U.S. District Courts Faith Center Church Evangelistic Ministries v. Glover Details Documents Summary A federal judge ruled in 2009 that … "religious services." ADF attorneys filed suit on behalf of Faith Center Evangelistic Ministries and its leader, …
  • … Won U.S. Courts of Appeals Speech First v. Shrum Details Documents Profiles Summary …
  • … Active U.S. Courts of Appeals Volokh v. James Details Documents Profiles Summary … Volokh v. James … free speech … New York … social media … hate speech … Volokh v. James …
  • … Lost U.S. District Courts Bloedorn v. Grube Details Documents Summary Benjamin Bloedorn, a Christian, and a a few friends attempted to share their faith in a "free speech" zone on the campus of Georgia Southern University. A university official …
  • … Active U.S. Courts of Appeals Bates v. Pakseresht Details Videos Documents Resources Profiles Summary Oregon Department of Human Services denied single mother Jessica Bates’ …
  • … Won U.S. District Courts Sheldon v. Dhillon Details Documents Summary In July 2008, ADF and Pacific Justice Institute attorneys filed a lawsuit on behalf of a former San Jose City College professor fired for …
  • … Won U.S. District Courts Brooker v. The Governors of Missouri State University Details Documents Summary Emily Brooker was a quiet student … shop.  She was looking for more ways to put her Christian faith into practice, and she found it—in class.  Emily asked …
  • … Won U.S. Courts of Appeals Brown v. City of Pittsburgh Details Documents … The Court noted that the ordinance put a burden on free speech that was “unprecedented” and “unduly--and …