Filter by
Search
Showing 2139 results for "michigan farmers fight against east lansings unconstitutional censorship continues"
- Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys represent Prince William County clerk
- The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Erin Hawley, vice president of the Center for Life and regulatory practice, regarding a conditional cross-petition ADF attorneys filed with the U.S. Supreme Court Thursday in Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The cross-petition asks the high court to deny the Biden administration’s and Danco Laboratories’ request for the court to hear the case and instead to let stand the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit’s ruling that restored critical safeguards for chemical ...
- WHO: Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Matt Sharp, director of the ADF Center for Legislative Advocacy WHAT: Speaking at Mississippi Advocacy Group rally supporting legislation protecting children from harmful and life-altering medical procedures WHEN: Tuesday, Jan. 24, beginning at 1 p.m. CST WHERE: Mississippi Trade Mart, 1200 Mississippi St., Jackson. To schedule an interview, contact ADF Media Relations Specialist Jacqueline Ribeiro at (202) 961-9396. Alliance Defending Freedom is an alliance-building, non-profit legal organization committed to protecting religious freedom, free ...
- Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys file opening brief on appeal
- ADF attorneys filed friend-of-the-court brief on behalf of House speaker, Senate president pro tempore
- ADF attorneys file opening brief on appeal
- Federal court orders state to allow pro-adoption plates as part of decision in 7-year-old ADF lawsuit
- West Virginia attorney general, ADF attorneys ask 4th Circuit to uphold state pro-life laws
- 5th Circuit blocks abuse of federal law, rules to protect emergency rooms from govt overreach
- The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Legal Counsel David Hacker regarding the U.S. Supreme Court’s unanimous decision Thursday in Lane v. Franks, which affirmed that the First Amendment protects the speech of public employees outside the workplace on matters of public concern: “No one should be fired or suffer other kinds of retaliation for speech outside the workplace, especially when that person is testifying truthfully in court, as Mr. Lane was. We see all too often that public universities and colleges place political litmus tests on employees. But as ...