Search

What is happening? At a time when the need to provide children with a stable and loving home is at a point of “crisis,” many states are forcing adoptive parents to pass an ideological litmus test to qualify. In some states, if the parents aren’t willing to push the government’s message on sexuality and gender, they can’t adopt. Simply put: government officials and policies are actively discriminating against Americans of faith—prioritizing ideology over the needs of kids. That’s cruel, it harms children, and it’s unconstitutional. Who is harmed? Nearly 400,000 children are currently in the ...

… Conversations with friends and family about abortion can be heated and emotional. The historic outcome … a unique opportunity to dispel common myths about abortion while compassionately defending unborn lives. Use … guide to help you navigate tough conversations involving abortion with boldness, truth, and grace. GET MY GUIDE   …

… Our culture lies to pregnant women, and tells them that abortion is “health care,” that it’s a simple, painless procedure. In truth, abortion destroys innocent life and often leaves women … in England TWICE for silently praying in front of an abortion facility. A recently passed law in England even …

… visits—that it once provided to women using high-risk abortion drugs. ADF is holding the FDA accountable for its …

… American, am still committed to the effort to eradicate abortion and protect innocent pre-born life! With the … of Roe v. Wade, we now have an opportunity to end abortion once and for all, but I realize that we still have …

… in violation of free speech—and truth. Working to expand abortion access through chemical abortion drugs, drugs recklessly approved through the FDA and …

… in violation of free speech—and truth. Working to expand abortion access through chemical abortion drugs, drugs recklessly approved through the FDA and …

… in violation of free speech—and truth. Working to expand abortion access through chemical abortion drugs, drugs recklessly approved through the FDA and …

When Assistant Principal Emily Mais merely questioned the CRT-inspired curriculum that her school was forcing on students, she was ostracized, harassed, shamed, and even called racist. She saw that the “anti-racist” teaching training was actually directing teachers to be racist in seeing their students as members of groups, based on skin color, and treating them differently based on their race. The work environment got so bad that Emily was eventually forced to resign. With her Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys, Emily has sued the school district, which violated her constitutionally ...

… for removing its original safety standards for high-risk abortion drugs. Women should have the ongoing care of a …