Search

… Our case against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will … care about that—and every American should care about this case. As oral argument approaches, will you join us in … as for the Supreme Court justices who will consider the case? … Historic Case Before U.S. Supreme Court … Supreme …

Women face severe, even life-threatening, harm because the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) disregarded their health and safety. By removing safety standards it once provided to women using abortion drugs, the FDA recklessly endangered them. And because of the FDA’s lawless actions, women and girls across the country have suffered. This spring, we’re asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hold the FDA accountable. We’re representing pro-women doctors who have witnessed firsthand the harm to women and girls caused by what the FDA has done. Will you stand with Alliance Defending Freedom and these ...

… Civil Rights Commission , 303 Creative v. Elenis , and Brush & Nib Studio v. Phoenix , which Scruggs argued at the Arizona …

… other states ready to stand up and protect children. … New Case Defends Law Taking on Dangerous Medical “Care” for …

… left the corporate design world to start her own design studio, 303 Creative, in 2012 so she could promote causes … freedom and which ones don’t. It’s no wonder that Lorie’s case has landed at the U.S. Supreme Court, which will hear arguments in this landmark case this December. Free speech is essential to a free …

… now and help support Branches Pregnancy Resource Center’s case? Your support will help fuel this important case, which could allow ministries like Branches to serve …

… market. In 303 Creative v. Elenis and Amy Lynn Photography Studio v. City of Madison , Anderson counseled creative …

Imagine feeling a conviction to adopt and care for other children—to love those who don’t even have one parent. And now imagine that your state is excluding you from adopting any child because you won’t agree to contradict your Christian beliefs— you won’t use inaccurate pronouns, take children to events like Pride parades, and facilitate a child’s access to dangerous procedures like potentially sterilizing puberty blockers. This is exactly the situation Jessica Bates faces in Oregon. Oregon officials are preventing Jessica from adopting because they disagree with her Christian beliefs—despite ...

When the government discriminates against foster/adoptive parents based on their religious beliefs, children are harmed. These kids need a forever home—not political ideology. Christians and the church have been key to providing resources and open arms to vulnerable children for hundreds of years. The earliest orphanages in North America were created by dedicated Christian groups, and these faithful people continue to lead the way today. Yet, some state officials now reject Christian and other religious families—forcing children to wait longer for a loving home—because they disagree with the ...

What is happening? At a time when the need to provide children with a stable and loving home is at a point of “crisis,” many states are forcing adoptive parents to pass an ideological litmus test to qualify. In some states, if the parents aren’t willing to push the government’s message on sexuality and gender, they can’t adopt. Simply put: government officials and policies are actively discriminating against Americans of faith—prioritizing ideology over the needs of kids. That’s cruel, it harms children, and it’s unconstitutional. Who is harmed? Nearly 400,000 children are currently in the ...