Filter by
Search
Showing 1891 results for "external iframe caf secondarypage cases"
- … said ADF Senior Counsel David French, director of CAF. “Temple has argued throughout this case that student … said ADF Senior Counsel David French, director of CAF. “Temple has argued throughout this case that student …
- European Court of Human Rights accepts case against Belgium that illustrates dangers of legalizing euthanasia.
Case closed: Catholic nonprofit can keep its doors open to serve thousands of vulnerable MI children
ADF attorneys representing Catholic Charities West Michigan favorably settle case with state- The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Austin R. Nimocks regarding the California Supreme Court’s decision Wednesday in Hollingsworth v. O’Connell to deny the petition to uphold the state’s voter-approved marriage amendment: “Elected officials should enforce the law. Though the current California officials are unwilling to enforce the state constitution, we remain hopeful that one day Californians will elect officials who will. It is unfortunate that the California Supreme Court chose not to decide the important, still-unresolved questions about the ...
- … said ADF Senior Counsel David French, director of CAF. “This settlement represents an extremely positive … said ADF Senior Counsel David French, director of CAF. “This settlement represents an extremely positive …
- … on a college campus,” said ADF Senior Legal Counsel and CAF Director David French. “Instead of being a marketplace … on a college campus,” said ADF Senior Legal Counsel and CAF Director David French. “Instead of being a marketplace …
- Calif. college student represented by ADF attorneys was threatened with arrest, expulsion for sharing faith on campus
- The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom General Counsel Kristen Waggoner regarding the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision Friday not to review the Washington Supreme Court’s decision against floral artist Barronelle Stutzman in Arlene’s Flowers v. State of Washington and Arlene’s Flowers v. Ingersoll: “Although the outcome of this case is tragic, the critical work of protecting the First Amendment freedoms of all Americans must continue. No one should be forced to express a message or celebrate an event they disagree with. A government that can crush someone like ...
- High court will consider constitutionality of Mass. law that censors free speech of pro-life advocates
- Barronelle Stutzman, the sole owner of Arlene’s Flowers in Richland, Wash., has for her entire career served and employed people who identify as homosexual. Despite this, the American Civil Liberties Union and the Washington attorney general allege that she is guilty of unlawful discrimination because she acted consistent with her faith and declined to use her creative skills to beautify the same-sex ceremony of a long-time customer, Robert Ingersoll, and another man, Curt Freed.