Search

When the government discriminates against foster/adoptive parents based on their religious beliefs, children are harmed. These kids need a forever home—not political ideology. Christians and the church have been key to providing resources and open arms to vulnerable children for hundreds of years. The earliest orphanages in North America were created by dedicated Christian groups, and these faithful people continue to lead the way today. Yet, some state officials now reject Christian and other religious families—forcing children to wait longer for a loving home—because they disagree with the ...

… pill (Plan B) and ella in Ralph’s Thriftway’s pharmacy. Case: Stormans v. Wiesman Image For nearly four generations … States Supreme Court, asking them to hear the Stormans’ case. Unfortunately, on June 28, 2016, the Court denied … States Supreme Court, asking them to hear the Stormans’ case. Unfortunately, on June 28, 2016, the Court denied …

What is happening? At a time when the need to provide children with a stable and loving home is at a point of “crisis,” many states are forcing adoptive parents to pass an ideological litmus test to qualify. In some states, if the parents aren’t willing to push the government’s message on sexuality and gender, they can’t adopt. Simply put: government officials and policies are actively discriminating against Americans of faith—prioritizing ideology over the needs of kids. That’s cruel, it harms children, and it’s unconstitutional. Who is harmed? Nearly 400,000 children are currently in the ...

Now there’s no doubt. Detailed information released this week by the U.S. House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government makes plain that the Biden administration has been partnering with major banks and payment processors to censor non-profit ministries and threaten the freedom of everyday Americans. And now, the subcommittee has revealed that the government has targeted Alliance Defending Freedom. We’ve been unlawfully swept up in the federal government’s “domestic terrorist” dragnet. While ADF was advocating on behalf of the freedom of EVERY American to live ...

… at the University of North Carolina-Wilmington (UNCW). Case: Adams v. Trustees of the University of North … pay him $50,000 in back pay. UNCW initially appealed the case, but later settled the case, agreeing to drop the appeal, to adopt procedures to …

… Selina Soule, Chelsea Mitchell, and Alanna Smith Stories Case: Soule v. Connecticut Association of Schools Track … Athletic Conference (CIAC). The outcome of this case could impact young women nationwide. Activists continue … forced to compete against males. Read more about their case below. Donate Now Is this the end for women’s athletics? …

… District, and Valentine’s Day was right around the corner. Case: J.A. v. Nazareth Area School District Image Justus … religious points of view in school.  … Justus Abramo … Case:J.A. v. Nazareth Area School District … Valentine's Day …

… The Wunderlich Family The government seized their children [CASE UPDATE: July 4, 2019]:  The Grand Chamber (High Court) … decided to decline hearing the appeal of the Wunderlich case. While this news is certainly disappointing, ADF … But in a shocking move, the Court declined to review their case and bring justice to this family. What part of home …

… is taking a stand for freedom — this time in Kentucky Case: Chelsey Nelson Photography v. Louisville-Jefferson …

… Punished for ‘Jesus Loves Me’ Mask. Will you help Lydia? Case: L.B. v. Simpson County School District Nine-year-old … since [adf:scotus_wins_year]. … Lydia Booth … COVID-19 … Case:L.B. v. Simpson County School District … Mississippi … …