Search

When the government discriminates against foster/adoptive parents based on their religious beliefs, children are harmed. These kids need a forever home—not political ideology. Christians and the church have been key to providing resources and open arms to vulnerable children for hundreds of years. The earliest orphanages in North America were created by dedicated Christian groups, and these faithful people continue to lead the way today. Yet, some state officials now reject Christian and other religious families—forcing children to wait longer for a loving home—because they disagree with the ...

… He was a key member of ADF’s litigation team in Uzuegbunam v. Preszewski , leading to a U.S. Supreme Court victory … He was a key member of ADF’s litigation team in Uzuegbunam v. Preszewski , leading to a U.S. Supreme Court victory …

What is happening? At a time when the need to provide children with a stable and loving home is at a point of “crisis,” many states are forcing adoptive parents to pass an ideological litmus test to qualify. In some states, if the parents aren’t willing to push the government’s message on sexuality and gender, they can’t adopt. Simply put: government officials and policies are actively discriminating against Americans of faith—prioritizing ideology over the needs of kids. That’s cruel, it harms children, and it’s unconstitutional. Who is harmed? Nearly 400,000 children are currently in the ...

… Court, including Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. Comer in the 2016-2017 term , Town of Greece v. Galloway and Conestoga Wood Specialties v. Burwell in the 2013-2014 term, Reed v. Town of Gilbert in …

… of ADF’s religious liberty cases, including Town of Greece v. Galloway . Eggleston received her J.D. with honors from … of ADF’s religious liberty cases, including Town of Greece v. Galloway . Eggleston received her J.D. with honors from …

… preserving the freedoms of speech and religion. In NIFLA v. Becerra he was part of the Supreme Court team that … being forced to refer for abortion. In Women’s Health Link v. City of Ft. Wayne, Ind. , Theriot defended the freedom of … who assisted Mississippi’s legal team with defending Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization at the Supreme Court, …

… and in the public square, including Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission , 303 Creative v. Elenis , and Brush & Nib Studio v. Phoenix , which Scruggs argued at the Arizona Supreme …

Now there’s no doubt. Detailed information released by the U.S. House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government makes plain that the Biden administration has been partnering with major banks and payment processors to censor non-profit ministries and threaten the freedom of everyday Americans. And now, the subcommittee has revealed that the government has targeted Alliance Defending Freedom. We’ve been unlawfully swept up in the federal government’s “domestic terrorist” dragnet. While ADF was advocating on behalf of the freedom of EVERY American to live according to ...

… support for ADF’s litigation in College of the Ozarks v. Biden . Garrison was a federal prosecutor for 14 years and … support for ADF’s litigation in College of the Ozarks v. Biden . Garrison was a federal prosecutor for 14 years and …

… in the U.S. Supreme Court in Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer , securing a 7-2 victory that overturned Missouri’s … in a state funding program. Cortman also argued Reed v. Town of Gilbert , securing a 9-0 ruling that prohibits the … also served as lead counsel in Conestoga Wood Specialties v. Burwell , Geneva College v. Burwell and Southern Nazarene …