Search

When the government discriminates against foster/adoptive parents based on their religious beliefs, children are harmed. These kids need a forever home—not political ideology. Christians and the church have been key to providing resources and open arms to vulnerable children for hundreds of years. The earliest orphanages in North America were created by dedicated Christian groups, and these faithful people continue to lead the way today. Yet, some state officials now reject Christian and other religious families—forcing children to wait longer for a loving home—because they disagree with the ...

… who joined an amicus brief in 303 Creative v. Elenis  explaining the artistic process behind website and graphic … deeply held beliefs. Lorie challenged that law, and her case has gone all the way to the Supreme Court. In December, … case because—like her—I am a web designer and run my own studio. I've been a web designer for 20 years and am …

… the school board in court. Read the details of this case below. Who is suing Albemarle County Public Schools? … ideology from being indoctrinated into their children. Case timeline February 2019 : Albemarle County School Board … judge ruled in favor of the school board and dismissed the case. ADF attorneys are appealing the decision . The bottom …

… helped file a lawsuit on behalf of the company, and the case eventually went to the U.S. Supreme Court. Who are the … Supreme Court ruled on both cases at the same time. In a 5-4 decision, the Court ruled that the HHS abortion pill … to their beliefs without being punished by the government. Case timeline January 2013 : With the help of ADF and allied …

What is happening? At a time when the need to provide children with a stable and loving home is at a point of “crisis,” many states are forcing adoptive parents to pass an ideological litmus test to qualify. In some states, if the parents aren’t willing to push the government’s message on sexuality and gender, they can’t adopt. Simply put: government officials and policies are actively discriminating against Americans of faith—prioritizing ideology over the needs of kids. That’s cruel, it harms children, and it’s unconstitutional. Who is harmed? Nearly 400,000 children are currently in the ...

We asked a number of national pro-life advocates to answer the question, ‘How can we best support vulnerable women faced with an unplanned pregnancy?’

… gifts, talents, and messages with the world. That is the case for Christie DeTrude, the owner of Queen of Angels … In addition, it threatened to prevent employees from even explaining Catholic beliefs about marriage, gender, and … Queen of Angels sent a letter to the city of Jacksonville explaining its religious beliefs, pronoun policy, and desire …

… falls flat, and the appellate court should reject it. Case timeline December 2019: A woman filed a lawsuit against … 2023: ADF attorneys presented oral arguments in the case before the Minnesota Court of Appeals. … … 7657 … 7633 … …

… message. That same principle is illustrated by the case of Green v. Miss United States of America . In this case, Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys represent United … deserve their own pageants. Beyond pageantry, though, the case implicates all of our freedom to publicly communicate …

… accordingly. John wrote a letter to the school district explaining that he believed this policy would harm … filed a petition asking the full court to hear John’s case, and the court said it would wait for the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in a similar case,  Groff v. DeJoy , before it decided whether to grant …