Search

The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Erik Baptist regarding a friend-of-the-court brief ADF attorneys filed Friday on behalf of Ratio Christi, a nationwide Christian apologetics organization. The brief was filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in Secular Student Alliance v. U.S. Department of Education, in which a secular student group is suing the federal government over a rule that protects the First Amendment freedoms of religious student groups on college campuses: “Universities are meant to be a marketplace of ideas ...

… James School   v. Biel  argues that a “minister” should be defined by objective evidence based on religious functions the employee performs, as defined in good faith by the religious organization, rather … James School   v. Biel  argues that a “minister” should be defined by objective evidence based on religious functions …

… the extent to which it is to be taught has not been well defined.  Three abortion and feminist groups brought suit … the extent to which it is to be taught has not been well defined.  Three abortion and feminist groups brought suit …

… the religious functions an employee is asked to perform as defined by those qualified to make that judgment: the … the religious functions an employee is asked to perform as defined by those qualified to make that judgment: the …

… should understand that the U.S. Constitution prohibits anti-religious bias, which is what the state exhibited when … should understand that the U.S. Constitution prohibits anti-religious bias, which is what the state exhibited when …

… claim that there’s no reason whatsoever for marriage to be defined as one man and one woman should go down as one of the … between same-sex couples. “Marriage has always been defined as one man and one woman by the federal government,” … “In fact, it was a condition of statehood that marriage be defined as one man and one woman during the polygamy battle …

The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Austin R. Nimocks regarding the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court Wednesday to strike down the federal Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. Windsor: “The Supreme Court got it wrong in saying that a state that has redefined marriage can force that definition on the federal government. The federal government should be able to define what marriage is for federal law just as states need to be able to define what marriage is for state law. Americans should be able to continue advancing the truth about ...

… Colorado law that threatens Lorie’s liberty—the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act—is the same one that has been used to … Colorado law that threatens Lorie’s liberty—the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act—is the same one that has been used to …

ADF attorneys representing Dr. Nicholas Meriwether favorably settle First Amendment case with university.

House moves forward with organizing defense of federal Defense of Marriage Act