Filter by
Search
Showing 2021 results for "nc county may ask us supreme court hear prayer case"
- … NC county asks US Supreme Court to reaffirm freedom to pray before public …
- … Forsyth County will ask U.S. Supreme Court to review prayer case County commission votes … court that upheld a ban on prayers by clergy that may mention a particular deity prior to public …
- … Christian broadcasters ask Supreme Court to hear their religious freedom case Lawsuit takes issue with …
- … ADF attorneys ask U.S. Supreme Court to review Forsyth County prayer case … 4th Circuit that upheld a ban on prayers by clergy that may mention a particular deity prior to public meetings. ADF …
- … US Supreme Court asked to weigh in on strange ruling against NY town’s … policy and offered unusual potential changes to it. In May, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit said that, …
- … NC county seeks to resume prayers in light of US Supreme Court decision ADF attorneys ask court to lift order against Forsyth County prayer policy … upheld a similar policy from the town of Greece, N.Y., on May 5 and affirmed that Americans are free to pray according …
- … US Supreme Court to hear case on chemical abortion drugs Published … v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Senior …
- … US Supreme Court declines to hear WA counseling censorship case … 2023 Related Case: Tingley v. Ferguson The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Senior …
- … U.S. Supreme Court refuses Forsyth County prayer case despite divided lower courts 4th Circuit … standard than rest of country after high court turns away NC case Published January 17, 2012 Related Case: Joyner v. … a district court’s ban on prayers by invited clergy that may mention a particular deity prior to public meetings. The …
- … ADF asks Supreme Court to hear Mich. student religious speech case Petition requests … student’s religious expression on a classroom project may be categorically identified as “offensive” and therefore …