Summary
In 2012, two men asked Jack Phillips to create a wedding cake celebrating a same-sex marriage. Jack politely declined, offering to sell them anything in his store, but designing a custom wedding cake for a same-sex marriage was not something he could do, because of his religious beliefs about marriage. The Colorado Civil Rights Commission acted on the couple’s complaint, finding Jack violated anti-discrimination law—despite the Commission giving a free pass to three different bakers who refused orders from customers opposing same-sex marriage.
ADF represented Jack at the U.S. Supreme Court, arguing that the government cannot force artists to use their expressive talents to celebrate events or express ideas that they do not support. In a 7-2 ruling, the Court found that the government was wrong to punish Jack for peacefully living out his beliefs in the marketplace. The Court called out the Commission’s double standard of punishing Jack, but not the three artists who refused messages against same-sex marriage. Holding that the free exercise clause forbids hostility toward religion, it rejected one Commissioner’s claim that believing marriage is between a man and woman is akin to being racist.
Masterpiece expanded on what the Court said before: religious persons merit protection as they seek to teach the principles that are so fulfilling and so central to their lives and faiths. And the decision dovetails with NIFLA v. Becerra, where the Court firmly rejected government-compelled speech—an issue argued, but not decided in Masterpiece. Together, Masterpiece and NIFLA are foundational to restoring religious freedom in America.
What’s at stake
The freedom to operate a business according to your religious beliefs
The freedom to express yourself artistically without endorsing a view with which you disagree
Our role in this case
Alliance Defending Freedom and its allies defended Jack Phillips and his business, Masterpiece Cakeshop, free of charge.







Commentary
Masterpiece Cakeshop owner Jack Phillips: How I became the face of ‘rights of conscience’ litigation in US | Fox News
Jack Phillips
May 17, 2021
Masterpiece Cakeshop and the Foundations of Free Speech and Toleration | Oxford Journal of Law and Religion | Oxford Academic
Tedesco, Jeremy D
October 10, 2020
Masterpiece Cakeshop owner Jack Phillips: Florist Barronelle Stutzman deserves another chance at justice | Fox News
Jack Phillips
January 16, 2020
Another Jack Phillips lawsuit demonstrates that persistence can be virtue or vice
James Gottry
July 23, 2019
How Masterpiece Cakeshop fell short
John Bursch
June 20, 2019
Federalist Society: Compelled Speech in Masterpiece Cakeshop: What the Supreme Court’s June 2018 Decisions Tell Us About the Unresolved Questions
Jim Campbell
September 24, 2018
Compelled speech in Masterpiece CakeshopWhat the Supreme Court’s June 2018 decisions tell us about the unresolved questions
Jim Campbell
September 24, 2018
I wish you knew Jack. I think you’d really like him
Jeremy Tedesco
June 28, 2018
Here’s why the florist and the baker aren’t like the Red Hen’s owner
Chris Potts
June 28, 2017
Opinion | The Supreme Court puts a baker’s business — and artistic freedom — on the line – The Washington Post
James Gottry
June 26, 2017
Arguments separating fashion designers from other artists aren’t worthy of the runway
Jim Campbell
January 23, 2017
Religious freedom under attack in Colorado
Samuel Green
October 12, 2016
Why I’m asking the U.S. Supreme Court to protect artistic freedom
Jack Phillips
July 22, 2016
Everyone should be able to have their First Amendment cake & eat it too (GUEST RESPONSE)
Jeremy Tedesco
January 29, 2015