Skip to main content
Hero Image
Blog

While States Ban Life-Saving Surgeries During COVID-19 Shutdowns, Abortions Are Allowed to Continue

By Maureen Collins posted on:
June 24, 2020

For decades, the abortion industry has been telling us that abortion is just like any other medical procedure.

But now, thanks to the COVID-19 response in several states, this falsehood has been exposed.

Here’s what happened.

In late March, several governors began issuing executive orders that included temporary bans on elective surgeries. By limiting the number of medical procedures, state governments hoped to limit doctors’ and hospital workers’ exposure to the virus. This was also done in hopes of saving vital personal protective equipment for the medical professionals working on the frontlines of the pandemic.

Though a ban on elective surgeries to combat COVID-19 may seem like a small ask, it has huge implications for many people. Just because a surgery is “elective” doesn’t mean it’s unnecessary. An “elective” surgery is just a surgery that is scheduled in advance.

The fact is that thousands of people put off their life-altering—and in some cases life-saving—surgeries because of the coronavirus.

But in many states, there was one elective procedure that was permitted to continue. I bet you can guess what it is.

 

Abortions Continue While Most Surgeries Are Banned

The vast majority of states issued executive orders that either banned all elective procedures or prohibited some elective procedures from continuing.

But when it came to prohibiting abortions, pro-abortion activists protested. And many professional health organizations backed them up. Even the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists issued a statement saying, “to the extent that hospital systems or ambulatory surgical facilities are categorizing procedures that can be delayed during the COVID-19 pandemic, abortion should not be categorized as such a procedure.”

According to pro-abortion organizations, women seeking an abortion should take priority over people with cancerous tumors, those awaiting organ transplants, or those preparing for brain surgery. Life-saving medical procedures must halt. But the life-ending procedures must continue.

Unfortunately, many states listened to these abortion activists.

Of the many states that issued elective surgery bans, only nine postponed abortions. Four of those states—Alabama, Mississippi, Ohio, and Tennessee—faced challenges in federal court.

 

The Truth About Abortion

If abortion is just like any other medical procedure, then this doesn’t make any sense.

Like other elective procedures, surgical abortion brings patients into contact with hospital staff, requires the use of personal protective equipment, and is scheduled in advance.

So how is abortion any different from the elective procedures that were halted (besides the fact that it ends a human life and is never medically necessary)?

The abortion industry has long argued that there is no difference. But as soon as something threatens its abortion gold mine, then the same industry asks for special exceptions.

This isn’t unique to the COVID-19 crisis. There’s a case at the Supreme Court right now where abortion facilities are asking for a special exemption from Louisiana’s hospital admitting privileges requirements—requirements that applies equally to doctors at ambulatory surgical centers.

Ultimately, the abortion industry is built on the lie that children in the womb are not human persons. Because the truth is not at the center of their activism, they will use any argument to continue to perpetuate their industry—even if those arguments contradict. That’s how the pro-abortion movement can go from claiming that abortion is just like any other medical procedure to claiming it is somehow more necessary, more important, and deserves special treatment.

It’s infuriating that in several states, many patients waited for life-saving surgeries while abortionists used precious medical supplies to help them actively take lives. And it shows the lengths that the abortion industry is willing to go in order to protect its profits.


Maureen Collins

Maureen Collins

Web Writer

Maureen has a passion for writing and her work has appeared on The Federalist.


Religious Freedom

Supreme Court Vacates Ruling that Would Have Forced Orgs Like March for Life to Pay for Abortions

The March for Life Education and Defense Fund has kept busy in the courts the past several years, standing up for its right to operate according to its convictions.

Life

U.S. Supreme Court: Religious Orgs Can’t Be Forced to Fund Abortion

Today, the Supreme Court upheld U.S. Department of Health and Human Services rules that protect the conscience rights of religious and pro-life organizations.

Life

A Doctor Was Hauled Before a Hospital Review Board for Saving Lives

When this doctor saved the lives of two patients, he wasn’t expecting to get called before the Institutional Review Board of his hospital. But that's what happened.