Summary
Blaine Adamson and his printing business, Hands On Originals, came under attack when they declined to create t-shirts for the pride festival hosted by the Gay and Lesbian Services Organization (“GLSO”). Helping to spread a message that promotes sexual activity outside of a marriage between a man and a woman would violate Blaine’s Christian beliefs. So he could not in good conscience produce t-shirts for the GLSO’s event. Blaine nevertheless offered to connect the GLSO to another printer who would create the shirts for the same price that he would have charged. In response, however, the GLSO’s president filed a complaint with the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Human Rights Commission alleging sexual orientation discrimination.
Alliance Defending Freedom and its allies came to Blaine’s and Hands On Originals’ defense. They explained to the human rights commission that declining to produce t-shirts because they display a disagreeable message is not the same as declining an order based on the identity of the person who orders them.
Because the government cannot force citizens to promote a message they do not believe in, Alliance Defending Freedom asked the human rights commission to dismiss the complaint. Unfortunately, the commission refused to do so and, instead, found Blaine guilty of illegal discrimination and ordered him to print shirts with messages that conflict with his religious beliefs.
Alliance Defending Freedom appealed that order to a Kentucky circuit court. In April 2015, that court reversed the human rights commission’s order and affirmed Blaine’s and his company’s right to decline to print messages that conflict with their religious beliefs.
In May 2017, the Kentucky Court of Appeals also ruled that Blaine is free to decline orders that would require him to print messages that conflict with his religious beliefs.
The Lexington-Fayette Urban County Human Rights Commission appealed this decision to the Kentucky Supreme Court. On October 31, 2019, the Kentucky Supreme Court ruled in favor of Blaine, unanimously affirming that the Gay and Lesbian Services Organization did not have a legal right to sue Blaine or his business, Hands On Originals, for declining to print a message that violates his religious beliefs.
What’s at stake
The freedom to operate a business according to your deeply held beliefs without the fear of being punished by the government.
The basic human right not to endorse a view with which you disagree.
Our role in this case
Alliance Defending Freedom and its allies defended Blaine Adamson and his printing company, Hands On Originals.






Commentary
Justices Should Use Florist Case To Settle Free Speech Issues – Law360
Kristen Waggoner
November 20, 2019
CAMPBELL: Kentucky Decision On Christian Print Shop Shows Why Supreme Court Should Rule On Religious Business Owners | The Daily Caller
Jim Campbell
November 18, 2019
Time for the Supreme Court to clearly protect religious freedoms – Washington Examiner
Ryan Everson
November 06, 2019
Why This Christian T-Shirt Printer Has Unlikely LGBT Allies
Jim Campbell
September 03, 2019
Blaine Adamson: I am at the center of a lawsuit that is about everyone
Blaine Adamson
August 31, 2019
Here’s Why You Should Care About the Gay Pride Shirt Case at the Kentucky Supreme Court | Ricochet
Jay Hobbs
August 23, 2019
I’m a T-shirt maker with gay customers and gay employees. I still was sued.
Blaine Adamson
September 17, 2017
Kentucky Court Ruling Protects Artist
Samuel Green
May 22, 2017
Kentucky ct. upholds constitutionally protected freedoms for allWill others follow suit?
James Gottry
May 15, 2017
Arguments separating fashion designers from other artists aren’t worthy of the runway
Jim Campbell
January 23, 2017
Designers can refuse to dress the Trumps. Other artists should have the same freedom. – The Washington Post
Jim Campbell
January 18, 2017
What Two Lesbian Printers Teach Us About Conscience Rights
Jim Campbell
December 17, 2016