Skip to main content
Hero Image

5 Things to Know about the New Johnson Amendment Fix

October 17, 2017

Today, Sen. James Lankford and Rep. Jody Hice introduced a bill in the Senate and the House of Representatives called the Free Speech Fairness Act. The bill is aimed at fixing the Johnson Amendment, a 1954 addition to the tax code that gives the IRS the ability to censor the speech of pastors, churches, and other nonprofit entities on issues related to candidates and elections.

Here are five things you need to know about the bill:


1.  The bill fixes but does not repeal the Johnson Amendment.

The bill does not repeal the Johnson Amendment. Instead, it amends the law to allow for speech that is made “in the ordinary course of the organization’s regular and customary activities.” This means that, as you carry out the mission of your church, you would have the right to speak freely on all matters of life, including candidates and elections. You would not have to fear IRS censorship or punishment for simply exercising your right to free speech and freedom of religion. Put simply, the bill inserts a “relief valve” for speech into the Johnson Amendment and gets the IRS out of the business of policing the speech of America’s pastors and churches. 

2.  The bill applies to all 501(c)(3) entities, not just churches.

The bill is not just limited to churches but applies to all entities organized and operating under section 501(c)(3) of the Tax Code. It is not just churches and pastors who suffer under the draconian regulations and penalties associated with the Johnson Amendment—it applies to all 501(c)(3) organizations. Because this is true, the fix should also apply to all 501(c)(3) organizations. The IRS never should have been put in the position of policing the speech of nonprofit entities, and this bill will remove that power from the IRS—a governmental agency that has been proven to abuse this type of power in the past and so should not be entrusted with it.

3.  The bill does not turn churches and charities into political action committees. 

The bill is specifically crafted to maintain the prohibition against 501(c)(3) organizations contributing money to candidates or campaigns. The bill only allows for speech in the “ordinary course of the organization’s regular and customary activities” so long as the organization does not incur “more than de minimis incremental expenses” for the speech.  Put simply, this means that speech about candidates and election can be added to whatever your organization is already doing as long as it does not cost the organization more than a de minimis (“an insignificant”) additional cost. The bill does not allow for campaign contributions to candidates or parties.

4.  The bill is constitutionally sound.

The bill removes a very unconstitutional restriction on speech that has existed for over 60 years. By applying it to all 501(c)(3) organizations, Sen. Lankford and Rep. Hice have introduced a constitutionally sound bill that provides relief to exempt organizations and removes the IRS from the speech police business. 

5.  The bill is the first step in getting Congress to fix what it created in 1954.

The introduction of the bill is the first step toward fixing the unconstitutional Johnson Amendment. There are many more steps to the legislative process before the bill can become law and provide the relief America’s pastors and churches are seeking.  Nevertheless, the introduction of this bill is an encouraging sign.

The Free Speech Fairness Act is Needed to Protect the Constitutional Freedoms of Pastors and Churches

The more people learn the facts about this unconstitutional law, the more they understand why a fix like the Free Speech Fairness Act is needed. That’s why Alliance Defending Freedom has created a FREE guide to understanding the Johnson Amendment and how to navigate political issues under the current law. We remain hopeful that the Free Speech Fairness Act will become law and America’s pastors will once again be free to speak from the pulpit on all matters of life without fearing government censorship or punishment.


Religious Freedom

A Student Punished for Privately Sharing Religious Views

Alliance Defending Freedom is representing this student to protect his right to share his beliefs without fear of punishment.

Religious Freedom

A Look at The Unjust Treatment of Churches During COVID-19 Shutdowns

The government has a duty to uphold the First Amendment, and it should not be singling out churches with extra regulations.

Religious Freedom

Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Religious Schools to Choose Who Teaches

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court affirmed that religious schools can decide who teaches their faith. This is an important victory for all religious schools!