CASENational Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Rauner

Client Story


Share this page
Summary
Illinois SB 1564 forces pregnancy care centers, medical facilities, and physicians who conscientiously object to involvement in abortions to adopt policies that provide women who ask for abortions with a list of providers “they reasonably believe may offer” them.
News Releases

Illinois, Hawaii put federal funding in jeopardy by forcing pregnancy centers, doctors to promote abortion

Sanctity of Life

Illinois, Hawaii put federal funding in jeopardy by forcing pregnancy centers, doctors to promote abortion

ADF attorneys file complaints with HHS over violations of federal law

Sep 12, 2017 Read More

Court halts Illinois mandate to promote abortion

Sanctity of Life

Court halts Illinois mandate to promote abortion

Injunction suspends enforcement of SB 1564, which ‘targets free speech rights’

Jul 20, 2017 Read More

Doctor, multiple pregnancy care centers file federal suit over Illinois mandate to promote abortion

Sanctity of Life

Doctor, multiple pregnancy care centers file federal suit over Illinois mandate to promote abortion

SB 1564 violates federal law, Constitution

Sep 30, 2016 Read More
Share this page
Documents
https://adflegal.blob.core.windows.net/mainsite-new/docs/default-source/documents/legal-documents/national-institute-of-family-and-life-advocates-v.-rauner/nifla-v-rauner---complaint-filed-with-hhs-on-behalf-of-dr-tina-gingrich-and-maryville-women-s-center-(2017-09-11).pdf?sfvrsn=39fe0b7b_4https://adflegal.blob.core.windows.net/mainsite-new/docs/default-source/documents/legal-documents/national-institute-of-family-and-life-advocates-v.-rauner/national-institute-of-family-and-life-advocates-v-rauner---preliminary-injunction-order.pdf?sfvrsn=e7a2e7e7_4https://adflegal.blob.core.windows.net/mainsite-new/docs/default-source/documents/legal-documents/national-institute-of-family-and-life-advocates-v.-rauner/national-institute-of-family-and-life-advocates-v-rauner---reply-in-support-of-motion-for-preliminary-injunction.pdf?sfvrsn=38473280_4https://adflegal.blob.core.windows.net/mainsite-new/docs/default-source/documents/legal-documents/national-institute-of-family-and-life-advocates-v.-rauner/national-institute-of-family-and-life-advocates-v-rauner---brief-in-support-of-motion-to-dismiss-and-opposed-to-motion-for-preliminary-injunct.pdf?sfvrsn=fcd4f9c5_6https://adflegal.blob.core.windows.net/mainsite-new/docs/default-source/documents/legal-documents/national-institute-of-family-and-life-advocates-v.-rauner/national-institute-of-family-and-life-advocates-v-rauner---brief-in-support-of-motion-for-preliminary-injunction.pdf?sfvrsn=27104feb_4https://adflegal.blob.core.windows.net/mainsite-new/docs/default-source/documents/legal-documents/national-institute-of-family-and-life-advocates-v.-rauner/national-institute-of-family-and-life-advocates-v-rauner---complaint.pdf?sfvrsn=e2481142_4
Court Title Date
Administrative Agency
Complaint filed with HHS on behalf of Dr. Tina Gingrich and Maryville Women’s Center (2017-09-11)
Trial Court
Preliminary injunction order
Trial Court
Reply in support of motion for preliminary injunction
Trial Court
Brief in support of motion to dismiss and opposed to motion for preliminary injunction
Trial Court
Brief in support of motion for preliminary injunction
Trial Court
Complaint