BLOGCollege Club Told to Get a “Different Purpose” to Become a Registered Student Organization

By Sarah Kramer Posted on: | August 23, 2018

When the South Carolina Politics Club (SCPC) – a non-partisan student group that seeks to organize and educate students on the structure, apparatus, and processes of South Carolina local and state politics – applied to be a Recognized Student Organization (RSO) at the College of Charleston, the group was given three options:

  1. Get a “different purpose”;
  2. Find “some common ground” with another student group, Fusion Party; or
  3. Get a “different concept” altogether.

But those options present a rather large problem: choosing any one of them ultimately spells out the end of SCPC. If you change a group’s purpose or its “concept,” it becomes a different group altogether. And asking it to merge with another student group – one that many members of SCPC are opposed to – also means that SCPC ceases to exist.

On top of that, if SCPC decides to continue operating as an unregistered group on campus, that puts it at a disadvantage to other student groups. It prevents the club from reserving space on campus for events, receiving funding from the student activities budget (which every student is required to pay into), and inviting speakers to campus. On top of that, school policy forbids RSOs “from affiliating and socializing” with unregistered organizations, calling them “risky.”

That’s why SCPC reached out to Alliance Defending Freedom. And it’s why we are filing a lawsuit on its behalf.

The root of the problem is this: College of Charleston officials have unlimited discretion in deciding which student groups qualify to become RSOs and which do not, and they can deny any student group that they decide “duplicates the mission or purpose of another organization.” That means college officials have the power to marginalize certain student groups simply by claiming that their purpose is too similar to another group on campus – even if the differences between the two can be clearly articulated.

Not only is that viewpoint discrimination, but it also take away the students’ freedom of association. Two strikes against the Constitution.

The college campus is a place where students should be able to engage with a variety of viewpoints, even if college officials do think those viewpoints are “risky.” That way, students can evaluate different viewpoints and decide for themselves what to think and believe.

Seeing as public college officials should be protecting the constitutional freedoms of their students and promoting a true marketplace of ideas, perhaps it is actually the College of Charleston that needs to re-evaluate its purpose in light of the Constitution.

Sarah Kramer

Digital Content Specialist

Sarah worked as an investigative reporter before joining the Alliance Defending Freedom team.

More from ADF View All

How Jack Phillips’ Case Brought One Man to Christ

Religious Freedom

How Jack Phillips’ Case Brought One Man to Christ

Jack's nephew, Sean, didn’t fully grasp why Jack was willing to take such a s...

Mr. Funny | Words | Author | I'm the icon | www | 11/16/2018 17:08:42 Read More

This Campus Club Has Been Denied Recognition for Three Years... Because It’s Christian

Religious Freedom

This Campus Club Has Been Denied Recognition for Three Years... Because It’s Christian

The university will not approve a Christian group for recognition because it ...

Mr. Funny | Words | Author | I'm the icon | www | 11/15/2018 16:14:03 Read More

The Word Planned Parenthood Doesn’t Want to Say

Sanctity of Life

The Word Planned Parenthood Doesn’t Want to Say

The International Planned Parenthood Federation instructs activists to avoid ...

Mr. Funny | Words | Author | I'm the icon | www | 10/30/2018 20:44:56 Read More

About That Times Square Billboard

Culture

About That Times Square Billboard

The group behind this is clearly trying to smear us behind the shade of anony...

Mr. Funny | Words | Author | I'm the icon | www | 11/17/2018 03:37:48 Read More