BLOGBreaking: U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Hear Case Challenging Ten Commandments Monument

By Sarah Kramer Posted on: | October 16, 2017

Given our current culture, it should come as no surprise that Ten Commandments monuments are often the target of legal challenges. 

Twelve years ago, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that a Ten Commandments monument in Texas could stay because it has historical – not just religious – significance. Still, rulings at the circuit court level on this issue continue to be inconsistent. 

Unfortunately, the Supreme Court has allowed this inconsistency to continue, after declining to hear a similar case out of Bloomfield, New Mexico. Two Bloomfield residents, represented by the ACLU, sued the city because of a Ten Commandments monument displayed alongside other historical monuments at city hall. They claim it is the government’s attempt to establish a religion and that they are “offended” by the display. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit ruled in their favor.

And the Supreme Court is allowing that ruling to stand, despite the fact that:


1. Private citizens erected and paid for this monument, not the government, in a venue the government created for private speech.

Bloomfield officials opened a plot of land for private citizens to place monuments celebrating our nation’s heritage. Local residents, on their own time, raised the funds to both make and place the monuments. When the Ten Commandments monument was  dedicated, no government official was present. And the monument and a nearby sign even state that the monument is presented by and speaks for private citizens.


2. It is displayed along with other monuments to our nation’s heritage.

The monument sits on the lawn of city hall with several other monuments, including the Bill of Rights, the Gettysburg Address, and the Declaration of Independence. Each monument holds significance in America’s history and heritage. The Ten Commandments influenced American legal thought, and Moses is regarded as one of the great lawgivers in history. In fact, his likeness appears at the Supreme Court among other great lawgivers.


3. Feeling “offended” is not grounds for a lawsuit.

Just because we disagree with what something says, does not mean we can ban it from the public square. But by allowing the Tenth Circuit decision to stand, the Supreme Court has given anti-religion advocates a license to challenge any monument that they see and offends them.


Just because a historical monument also has spiritual significance does not mean it should be excluded from the public square. The Supreme Court has recognized this once but failed to reinforce that distinction.

Alliance Defending Freedom will continue to work to ensure that our religious liberty is upheld and our religious heritage preserved. 


To stay up to date on the latest issues and cases regarding your religious liberty, sign up for our newsletter.
Keep Me Updated

Sarah Kramer

Digital Content Specialist

Sarah worked as an investigative reporter before joining the Alliance Defending Freedom team.

More from ADF View All

Does Your Church Have Blind Spots?

Religious Freedom

Does Your Church Have Blind Spots?

Whether we like to admit it or not, there are people and organized groups tha...

Mr. Funny | Words | Author | I'm the icon | www | 02/13/2018 17:50:37 Read More

Another One Bites the Dust: SIUE Student Group Successfully Challenges Speech Zone Policy

Religious Freedom

Another One Bites the Dust: SIUE Student Group Successfully Challenges Speech Zone Policy

Officials at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville have agreed to change ...

Mr. Funny | Words | Author | I'm the icon | www | 02/05/2018 16:48:55 Read More

She Was on Her Way to Planned Parenthood, When She Saw the Sign

Sanctity of Life

She Was on Her Way to Planned Parenthood, When She Saw the Sign

Nineteen-year-old Maggie only saw rejection and judgment ahead if she told he...

Mr. Funny | Words | Author | I'm the icon | www | 02/19/2018 23:10:29 Read More

What Role Are We Asking Our Presidents to Play?

Culture

What Role Are We Asking Our Presidents to Play?

Nothing in our constitution allows our president to make law, but presidents ...

Mr. Funny | Words | Author | I'm the icon | www | 02/19/2018 20:30:10 Read More